Hab die Frage zu ADS-L mal uavionix gestellt und folgende Antwort bekommen -
die setzten aktuell nicht auf ADS-L.
---------------------------
The development of ADS-L in EASA was a political move within EASA and this decision for having ADS-L for General Aviation Electronic Conspicuity is not accepted by the General Aviation community at all (e.g. refer to AOPA Europe point of view).
The manned aviation community only can accept ADS-B as a standard for Electronic Conspicuity and refer to USA and UK where both ADS-B o 1090 MHz and ADS-B on 978 MHz is and will be used as it complies to the international standard.
More European member states are following UK and experimenting with low power ADS-B. CAA Norway (member of EASA) and Finland are experimenting with SkyEcho 2 now.
Furthermore, ICAO Aeronautical Surveillance Working Group has decided in 2022 to update Appendix S of ICAO Doc 9924 (surveillance Manual) and include item 4 ‘REDUCED CAPABILITY 1090 MHZ ADS-B EQUIPMENT’. In fact, low power ADS-B like SkyEcho 2.
Eurocontrol is, based on the ICAO decision and the implementation of UK, started with a draft document for specification of low power ADS-B for Europe in line with UK has written in CAP1391.
With other words….EASA cannot ignore the ICAO decision and ones the updated ICAO Doc 9924 is published, low power ADS-B for Europe is a fact and will be supported/implemented by EASA as an alternative for Electronic Conspicuity.
So now EASA is, for political reason, pushing ADS-L…And I think this could be a better solution for Remote ID for drones than the WIFI/Bluetooth standard which is now referred to for Remote ID for drones.
So, Our solution to show FLARM/ADS-L/Remote ID traffic is that this traffic is fused by ground infrastructure and when relevant rebroadcasted by ADS-B UAT to e.g. SkyEcho 2 to make it visible on SkyDemon, EasyVFR, Foreflight, et cetera.
I hope this will give you a good idea where we are heading in Europe.
Kind regard,
[Beitrag im Zusammenhang lesen]
